Contributing Writer
I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention some of the key milestones that enabled our first manned lunar landing. For example, there were five more solo astronaut Mercury flights after Alan Shepard’s and 10 two-man Gemini missions. Mercury showed that our astronauts could function in space, and Gemini perfected rendezvous and docking techniques and measured the effects of longer-duration flights. These flights paved the way for our nation’s six manned lunar landings.
But an unforeseen tragedy threatened the survival of the Apollo program: the Apollo 1 spacecraft’s flash fire that occurred January 27, 1967, during a test at the Cape’s Launch Complex 34. It took the lives of veteran astronauts Virgil “Gus” Grissom and Edward White, and rookie Roger Chaffee. The Apollo 1 spacecraft fire and the loss of our three astronauts greatly affected that launch team and support personnel throughout our close-knit community.
But in a “what-if” scenario, one that I’ve thought about many times since the Apollo 1 fire 52 years ago, I’ve always wondered if this tragedy could have been averted. I say this because earlier that day, my former roommate and local aerospace newspaper reporter, John Wasik, tried to convince NASA engineers to postpone the test. He based his unusual request on information he had received from Thomas Baron, who had worked for North American Aviation, the Command Module’s prime contractor, who said that company’s spacecraft was unsafe. But the test went on as planned, and following an extensive investigation after the fire, NASA dismissed Baron as a disgruntled former employee. I still have recurring questions regarding Baron’s safety claims, especially because Grissom had hung a lemon on his spacecraft, and a later investigation showed there was shoddy spacecraft workmanship. Additionally, Grissom’s widow later won a settlement against North American.
Astronaut Frank Borman closely supervised an extensive review of the Apollo 1 fire’s findings and the redesign of this spacecraft at the North American Rockwell manufacturing plant, in Downey, California. He literally moved into that company’s facility during the redesign and manufacture of the new Block II Apollo spacecraft. It featured a new quick-opening hatch that opened outwardly in about three seconds, the addition of a nitrogen-oxygen life support system, replacing the pure oxygen one that contributed to the Apollo 1 fire, and numerous other on-board systems improvements. Meanwhile, Rockwell International became part of North American and major top-management changes followed.
After making numerous spacecraft improvements during a year-and-a-half of unmanned flight testing, Apollo 7 was ready to be launched into Earth orbit on a Saturn 1B space vehicle at the Cape’s Complex 34, the same one where the Apollo 1 astronauts had perished. Aboard were mission commander, Walter “Wally” Schirra, who had flown on Mercury and Gemini flights, and new astronauts Walter Cunningham and Donn Eisle. Launched October 11, 1968, they orbited the Earth for 260 hours and certified the redesigned spacecraft for future manned flights to the Moon. This flight also included live television transmissions. You might remember the astronauts held up a sign, in a lighter moment, for their TV audience on Earth that read, “Keep those cards and letters coming in folks.”
Schirra had insisted that Guenter Wendt, known for his thoroughness and expertise during the Mercury and Gemini programs, be his mission’s pad leader, the final person who determines all checklist requirements have been met, prior to closing a manned spacecraft’s hatch for launch. But Wendt, a former World War II Luftwaffe flight engineer, was still working for McDonnell Douglas, the company that built the Mercury and Gemini spacecraft. Addressing this issue, Schirra–in his well-known assertive style–bypassed long-standing federal rules prohibiting the influencing of a company’s hiring policies. In doing so, he went to top North American Rockwell management and demanded it hire Wendt as the pad leader for the Apollo 7 spacecraft, which it did.
After the Block II spacecraft was man-rated for flight, the next step was to qualify the larger Apollo/Saturn V space vehicle for launching astronauts to the Moon. And to do this, NASA first relied on a full-scale space vehicle mock-up, designated the Apollo/Saturn V facilities vehicle, or AS-500-F. This gave support crews the opportunity to take it to the launch pad atop an incredibly large transporter, to check interfaces with various systems, including the mobile launcher’s nine swing arms, and with a separate mobile service structure.
A top-to-bottom view of the 36-story-tall Apollo/Saturn 501 space vehicle
in High Bay No. 1 of the Vehicle Assembly Building on May 25, 1967. (NASA photo
67P-0208 via NASA on the Commons/ Flickr)
|
"I STILL REMEMBER THAT ROCKET'S THUNDER-LIKE LIFTOFF"
Editor's Note: In addition to serving as public affairs officer for 17 years at Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Steve Milner was also a public affairs contractor with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration at Cape Canaveral during the manned Gemini, Apollo and Skylab programs.
No comments:
Post a Comment